UC Berkeley’s Student Athlete High Performance Center Project Brief
UC Berkeley was investigating several project initiatives in
the Southeast District of the campus, an area that had grown organically, with
little comprehensive vision, along Piedmont Avenue, one of the original
Olmsted-defined avenues that described the extent of the campus. These projects
included a collaborative undertaking between the Haas School of Business and
Berkeley’s School of Law known as the Law and Business Connection Building – to
be located between both schools – as well as the Student Athlete High
Performance Center (SAHPC), a much-needed athletic facility dedicated to both Cal
Bears football and high-level sports training, including Olympic training. In
an effort to give vision to these projects in the context of the extended
campus, Berkeley hired landscape architect David Rubin, former partner at OLIN,
now of David Rubin | LAND COLLECTIVE, to define the connective elements that
would unify these projects into a Southeast Campus Master Plan, fostering
connectivity across Piedmont and unifying the extended area with the rest of
campus. Simultaneously developing the vision plan, Rubin collaborated with
architectural teams on the Stadium effort (HNTB Los Angeles and STUDIOS
Architecture SF) and the Law and Business project (Moore Ruble Yudell
Architects) to ensure that the ideals of the bigger vision were also included
in these projects.
Although the Law and Business collaboration did not come to
fruition, the SAHPC building and ancillary projects associated with the upgrade
of the historic stadium moved forward. Working with HNTB Los Angeles and
Studios Architecture SF, Rubin redefined the proposed facility not as a four-sided
construct that would compete with the historic structure, but as a
complementary structure that could harmoniously fit within the significant
topography of the site (Berkeley’s stadium is set on a steep slope such that
the western façade is fully expressed while the eastern façade is non-existent
– the eastern edge is flush with grade) and preserve and embellish the historic
vista to the stadium (in a majority of the stadium’s life, the façade acted as
a wayfinding device and identifier for this area of campus). By pushing the SAHPC down into the ground and
taking advantage of the slope of the land, the resultant built form would be
expressed as a “smile” on the western face, while the roof of the building
could become a viable civic landscape for the University, supporting the campus
when 65,000 people are in attendance at a game, or on non-game days, when
students, faculty and administration are seeking a new, sacred space within the
campus.
In collaboration with the building architects, Rubin used
landscape principles to inform the character of the new structure. With
consideration to the potential composition as a whole, somehow, the materiality
of the project had to unify the articulated, board-formed concrete Beaux Arts
stadium with the rhyolite wall running along Piedmont’s northern eastern
sidewalk and everything in between. Informed by John Dixon Hunt’s writings on
“The Three Natures,” where proximity to culture is defined in the landscape through
increasing refinement and decreasing rustication, Rubin created a palette of
stone and concrete that changes as one approaches the stadium from
Piedmont. This Renaissance principle
defines landscape in three parts – the cultured landscape (manicured gardens),
the agricultural landscape (productive fields), and the Realm of the Gods (that
area of nature described as “wild”). Olmsted understood these principles,
whether explicit or inferred, and deployed them in his work, including the
Biltmore estate and Central Park. Applied at Berkeley, the coarse nature of the
Rhyolite wall became the most rusticated threshold, the SAHPC walls and façade
were generated in degrees of refinement in stone and concrete from more coarse
to less coarse, and the historic stadium walls represent the most refined
surface – an articulated Beaux Arts façade.
No comments:
Post a Comment